#MacOsX : VMware Fusion 5 vs. VMware Fusion 6 vs. VMware Fusion 7 vs. Parallels Desktop 7 [UPDATED]
I will not present functionalities here; it will be just a really brief benchmark.
Configuration:
- Hard Disk OCZ-AGILITY3 240 GB, firmware 1.15
- Graphics NVIDIA GeForce 9400M 256 MB
- Memory 8 GB 1333 MHz DDR3
- Processor 2.26 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
- MacBook Pro 13-inch, mid 2009
- Software
- Hosts: Mac OS X Lion 10.7.4 (Parallels 7, Fusion 5), Mac OS X Mavericks 10.9.4 (Fusion 5, Fusion 6), Mac OS X Yosemite 10.10.4 (Fusion 6, Fusion 7)
- Guest: Windows 7
Some info:
- VMs have 2,5 GB RAM allocated
- VMs have 1 CPU allocated
- Parallels was tested when disk was new, while Fusion with half of the space occupied
- Parallels VM has optimize Windows performance on
- Fusion VM has disk buffering disabled
- Fusion 5.0.5, Fusion 6.0.4, and Fusion 7.1.2 were tested with Windows Aero OFF
| Component | Parallels 7.15106 | Fusion 5.0.[1-3] | Fusion 5.0.5 | Fusion 6.0.4 | Fusion 7.1.2 |
| Processor: | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| Memory (RAM): | 5.5 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 5.5 |
| Graphics: | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 4.7 |
| Gaming graphics: | 4.4 | 4.2 | 5.1 | 5.2 | 4.2 |
| Primary hard disk: | 7.2 | 7.7 | 7.4 | 7.4 | 7.4 |
NOTE1: Fusion 5 seems to start and stop a bit slower than Parallels 7. Fusion 6 doesn’t improve, but SSD might be slower after this time than it was originally.
NOTE2: disabling Aero drastically improve Graphics performance, so do it!
NOTE3: Fusion 6 improve 3D Graphics performance over Fusion 5, but just slightly, so it is not worth an update. IMHO.
NOTE4: the combination of Mac OS X Yosemite and Fusion 7 has poor graphics performance. It is actually a big regression. I think Apple is to blame here.
Posted on August 24, 2012, in Apps and tagged apps, enterprise-it, Fusion, fusion 5, gaming, mac apps, Mac OS X, memory ram, Parallels, virtualbox, virtualization, VMware Fusion. Bookmark the permalink. 1 Comment.
whitehatty 
Pingback: #MacOsX : Mavericks Improve Virtual Machine Graphic Performance | whitehatty